If you’re a fan of 1990’s movies, you will likely remember a scene in the Academy Award winning film, As Good as It Gets. The Washington Post described the ruckus in theatres:
As I’ve written before, the US is facing a major healthcare value crunch.
after being an object of scorn in the 1990s. Despite their cost effectiveness, though,
Here is a graph of HMO penetration in Massachusetts over the very dynamic 2010-2012 period.
Why is this? I’ve heard a number of theories.
I recently came across a great paper from the University of Rochester. It argues that the basic problem with HMOs was that
Narrower hospital networks reduced the HMO plans’ value in the minds of consumers by a dollar equivalent of $62-$118 and the premium savings can't compensate for this perceived loss of value. The takeaway:
: there just isn’t enough slack in the system to make the math work. My thoughts-
Selling HMOs on the basis of cost alone won't work. To grow, HMOs need to reposition themselves—not as a poor man’s insurance product, but as an
I think consumers are ready for this proposition. In other industries, appreciation for coordinated services seems to be increasing. I was surprised to find that after decades of stagnation, the number of people taking package holidays has increased.
, at the same time as the cruise industry has moved towards inclusive pricing.
What are these consumers looking for? it's not rock-bottom pricing. If anything all-inclusives such as Club Med have gone up-market and this increase in amenities is drawing more buyers than ever before. Inclusive holidays are increasingly purchased by upper income buyers. These buyers want
There’s a real opportunity for HMOs to thrive over the next decade, but
. Here’s the video of the HMO scene from
, including the string of unprintable epithets: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jZVZc5qEBw
Comments